[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Azure Static Web Apps vs Deno Deploy

Azure Static Web Apps
7.2/ 10
Higher score
Deno DeployIndie
8.0/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Azure Static Web Apps wins 0, Deno Deploy wins 1 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricAzure Static Web AppsDeno Deploy
Score
Winner: right
7.28.0
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: right
Microsoft Corp.
IndependentIndie
Founded
20202021
Best for
devs who need free hostingDeno fans and static hosting lovers
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
Microsoft's static + Functions stack, Free tier is realEdge JavaScript runtime from the Deno team
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Azure Static Web Apps4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Free tier with 100GB bandwidth
  • ✓Fixed $9/app/mo pricing
  • ✓Azure Functions integration
  • ✓GitHub Actions deployment
– Cons
  • ✗Developer experience lags behind competitors
  • ✗Azure portal is complex
  • ✗No SLA on Free tier
  • ✗Slower cold starts than edge platforms
Deno Deploy4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Generous free tier, no gotchas
  • ✓Instant V8 isolate start-up
  • ✓Web-standard APIs, flexible use
  • ✓Smooth with Deno + Fresh
– Cons
  • ✗npm support still shaky
  • ✗Smaller community feel
  • ✗Venture-backed, watch for stability
  • ✗Less tooling than Vercel
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitAzure Static Web Apps ↗Score 7.2VisitDeno Deploy ↗Score 8.0
← Read full Azure Static Web Apps review·Read full Deno Deploy review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Azure Static Web Apps vs Bunny.net
Compare
Deno Deploy vs Bunny.net
Compare
Azure Static Web Apps vs Render
Compare
Deno Deploy vs Render
Compare
Azure Static Web Apps vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Deno Deploy vs GitHub Pages