[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Azure Static Web Apps vs Bunny.net

Azure Static Web Apps
7.2/ 10
Higher score
Bunny.netIndie
8.7/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Azure Static Web Apps wins 1, Bunny.net wins 1 (2 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricAzure Static Web AppsBunny.net
Score
Winner: right
7.28.7
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: right
Microsoft Corp.
IndependentIndie
Founded
20202015
Best for
devs who need free hostingBudget-minded static site owners
Price per mo
Winner: left
Free/ mo$1.00/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
Microsoft's static + Functions stack, Free tier is realCDN-first static hosting, pennies per GB
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Azure Static Web Apps4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Free tier with 100GB bandwidth
  • ✓Fixed $9/app/mo pricing
  • ✓Azure Functions integration
  • ✓GitHub Actions deployment
– Cons
  • ✗Developer experience lags behind competitors
  • ✗Azure portal is complex
  • ✗No SLA on Free tier
  • ✗Slower cold starts than edge platforms
Bunny.net4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓$0.01/GB bandwidth, super cheap
  • ✓Bunny Pages and Edge Scripting included
  • ✓Independent Slovenian ownership
  • ✓No request fees, $1/mo minimum
– Cons
  • ✗No free tier, $1/mo minimum
  • ✗Dashboard rougher than Cloudflare
  • ✗Email-only support
  • ✗Smaller ecosystem and integrations
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitAzure Static Web Apps ↗Score 7.2VisitBunny.net ↗Score 8.7
← Read full Azure Static Web Apps review·Read full Bunny.net review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Azure Static Web Apps vs Render
Compare
Bunny.net vs Render
Compare
Azure Static Web Apps vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Bunny.net vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Azure Static Web Apps vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
Bunny.net vs Firebase Hosting