[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Bunny.net vs GitHub Pages

Higher score
Bunny.netIndie
8.7/ 10
GitHub Pages
8.5/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Bunny.net wins 1, GitHub Pages wins 1 (2 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricBunny.netGitHub Pages
Score
Winner: left
8.78.5
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: left
IndependentIndie
Microsoft Corp.
Founded
20152008
Best for
High-traffic static sites that need real CDN economicsDevelopers hosting docs, portfolios, or project sites from a Git repo
Price per mo
Winner: right
$1.00/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
Tagline
CDN-first static hosting, pennies per GBFree static hosting on the world's biggest code host
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Bunny.net4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • $0.01/GB bandwidth, lowest credible CDN price
  • Bunny Pages and Edge Scripting included
  • Independent Slovenian ownership
  • No request fees, $1/mo minimum
– Cons
  • No free tier ($1/mo minimum)
  • Dashboard rougher than Cloudflare
  • Email-only support
  • Smaller ecosystem and integrations
GitHub Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • Free for public repos with usable soft limits
  • Git push to deploy, no separate dashboard
  • Custom domain and free HTTPS
  • GitHub Actions unlocks any static generator
– Cons
  • No serverless functions or dynamic routing
  • Private repo Pages requires paid GitHub plan
  • Default Jekyll pipeline is dated
  • Microsoft-owned (matters if that matters to you)
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.