[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Bunny.net vs GitHub Pages

Higher score
Bunny.netIndie
8.7/ 10
GitHub Pages
8.5/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Bunny.net wins 1, GitHub Pages wins 1 (2 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricBunny.netGitHub Pages
Score
Winner: left
8.78.5
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: left
IndependentIndie
Microsoft Corp.
Founded
20152008
Best for
Budget-minded static site ownersdevelopers looking for free static site hosting
Price per mo
Winner: right
$1.00/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
CDN-first static hosting, pennies per GBFree static hosting on the world's biggest code host
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Bunny.net4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓$0.01/GB bandwidth, super cheap
  • ✓Bunny Pages and Edge Scripting included
  • ✓Independent Slovenian ownership
  • ✓No request fees, $1/mo minimum
– Cons
  • ✗No free tier, $1/mo minimum
  • ✗Dashboard rougher than Cloudflare
  • ✗Email-only support
  • ✗Smaller ecosystem and integrations
GitHub Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Totally free for public repos
  • ✓Easy deploy with `git push`
  • ✓Supports custom domains with free HTTPS
  • ✓GitHub Actions for flex with static generators
– Cons
  • ✗No serverless or dynamic features
  • ✗Private repo Pages needs a paid plan
  • ✗Jekyll integration feels outdated
  • ✗Owned by Microsoft (if that bugs you)
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitBunny.net ↗Score 8.7VisitGitHub Pages ↗Score 8.5
← Read full Bunny.net review·Read full GitHub Pages review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Bunny.net vs Render
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Render
Compare
Bunny.net vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
Bunny.net vs Deno Deploy
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Deno Deploy