[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Bunny.net vs Render

Higher score
Bunny.netIndie
8.7/ 10
RenderIndie
8.6/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Bunny.net wins 1, Render wins 1 (2 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricBunny.netRender
Score
Winner: left
8.78.6
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
IndependentIndie
IndependentIndie
Founded
20152019
Best for
High-traffic static sites that need real CDN economicsDevs who want a Heroku replacement for static + backend in one place
Price per mo
Winner: right
$1.00/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
CDN-first static hosting, pennies per GBStatic sites free, paid backend without the AWS tax
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Bunny.net4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓$0.01/GB bandwidth, lowest credible CDN price
  • ✓Bunny Pages and Edge Scripting included
  • ✓Independent Slovenian ownership
  • ✓No request fees, $1/mo minimum
– Cons
  • ✗No free tier ($1/mo minimum)
  • ✗Dashboard rougher than Cloudflare
  • ✗Email-only support
  • ✗Smaller ecosystem and integrations
Render4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Truly free static hosting, no metered bandwidth
  • ✓Backend services with no AWS complexity
  • ✓Independent, no PE/big-cloud parent
  • ✓Unified billing across static/services/DB
– Cons
  • ✗Cold starts on free web services are slow
  • ✗Limited region selection (mostly US/EU)
  • ✗Postgres backup retention thin on lower tiers
  • ✗Status page sometimes lags real incidents
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitBunny.net ↗Score 8.7VisitRender ↗Score 8.6
← Read full Bunny.net review·Read full Render review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Bunny.net vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Render vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Bunny.net vs Deno Deploy
Compare
Render vs Deno Deploy
Compare
Bunny.net vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
Render vs Firebase Hosting