[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

GitHub Pages vs GitLab Pages

Higher score
GitHub Pages
8.5/ 10
GitLab Pages
7.8/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: GitHub Pages wins 1, GitLab Pages wins 0 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricGitHub PagesGitLab Pages
Score
Winner: left
8.57.8
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Microsoft Corp.
GitLab Inc.
Founded
20082014
Best for
Developers hosting docs, portfolios, or project sites from a Git repoTeams already on GitLab who want Pages as part of their CI pipeline
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
Free static hosting on the world's biggest code hostFree static hosting tied to GitLab CI/CD
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
GitHub Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Free for public repos with usable soft limits
  • ✓Git push to deploy, no separate dashboard
  • ✓Custom domain and free HTTPS
  • ✓GitHub Actions unlocks any static generator
– Cons
  • ✗No serverless functions or dynamic routing
  • ✗Private repo Pages requires paid GitHub plan
  • ✗Default Jekyll pipeline is dated
  • ✗Microsoft-owned (matters if that matters to you)
GitLab Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Available on Free tier, no add-on cost
  • ✓Full CI/CD pipeline integration
  • ✓Custom domain and HTTPS supported
  • ✓Self-host removes all quotas
– Cons
  • ✗Builds eat the 400 CI minutes/month free quota
  • ✗Premium tier ($29/user/mo) is steep vs GitHub
  • ✗Smaller community/template ecosystem than GitHub
  • ✗No edge functions or serverless layer
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitGitHub Pages ↗Score 8.5VisitGitLab Pages ↗Score 7.8
← Read full GitHub Pages review·Read full GitLab Pages review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
GitLab Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Render
Compare
GitLab Pages vs Render
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
GitLab Pages vs Firebase Hosting