[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

AWS Amplify Hosting vs Deno Deploy

AWS Amplify Hosting
7.0/ 10
Higher score
Deno DeployIndie
8.0/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: AWS Amplify Hosting wins 0, Deno Deploy wins 1 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricAWS Amplify HostingDeno Deploy
Score
Winner: right
7.08.0
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: right
Amazon.com, Inc.
IndependentIndie
Founded
20182021
Best for
Teams already deep in AWS who want Amplify to manage their static front-endDevs writing TypeScript/Deno at the edge with KV storage
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
Tagline
AWS's Vercel competitor, billed the AWS wayEdge JavaScript runtime from the Deno team
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
AWS Amplify Hosting4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • Tight integration with Cognito, AppSync, DataStore
  • Branch previews and atomic deploys
  • Lambda@Edge SSR support
  • $200 new-account credit (12 months)
– Cons
  • Pricing split across 4-5 metered axes
  • Bills easy to misforecast
  • Console UX is heavy and intimidating
  • Free Tier is now time-limited, not perpetual
Deno Deploy4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • Generous free tier with KV storage included
  • V8 isolates start near-instantly
  • Web-standard APIs, less framework lock-in
  • Tight Deno + Fresh integration
– Cons
  • npm compat isn't 100% drop-in
  • Smaller community than Workers / Vercel Edge
  • Venture-backed parent — long-term uncertainty
  • Less framework tooling than Vercel