[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

AWS Amplify Hosting vs Bunny.net

AWS Amplify Hosting
7.0/ 10
Higher score
Bunny.netIndie
8.7/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: AWS Amplify Hosting wins 1, Bunny.net wins 1 (2 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricAWS Amplify HostingBunny.net
Score
Winner: right
7.08.7
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: right
Amazon.com, Inc.
IndependentIndie
Founded
20182015
Best for
Teams already deep in AWS who want Amplify to manage their static front-endHigh-traffic static sites that need real CDN economics
Price per mo
Winner: left
Free/ mo$1.00/ mo
Renewal multiplier
Tagline
AWS's Vercel competitor, billed the AWS wayCDN-first static hosting, pennies per GB
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
AWS Amplify Hosting4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • Tight integration with Cognito, AppSync, DataStore
  • Branch previews and atomic deploys
  • Lambda@Edge SSR support
  • $200 new-account credit (12 months)
– Cons
  • Pricing split across 4-5 metered axes
  • Bills easy to misforecast
  • Console UX is heavy and intimidating
  • Free Tier is now time-limited, not perpetual
Bunny.net4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • $0.01/GB bandwidth, lowest credible CDN price
  • Bunny Pages and Edge Scripting included
  • Independent Slovenian ownership
  • No request fees, $1/mo minimum
– Cons
  • No free tier ($1/mo minimum)
  • Dashboard rougher than Cloudflare
  • Email-only support
  • Smaller ecosystem and integrations
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.