[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

AWS Amplify Hosting vs Azure Static Web Apps

AWS Amplify Hosting
7.0/ 10
Higher score
Azure Static Web Apps
7.2/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: AWS Amplify Hosting wins 0, Azure Static Web Apps wins 1 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricAWS Amplify HostingAzure Static Web Apps
Score
Winner: right
7.07.2
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Amazon.com, Inc.
Microsoft Corp.
Founded
20182020
Best for
Teams already deep in AWS who want Amplify to manage their static front-endTeams on Azure who want static + Functions on a single resource
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
Tagline
AWS's Vercel competitor, billed the AWS wayMicrosoft's static + Functions stack, Free tier is real
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
AWS Amplify Hosting4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • Tight integration with Cognito, AppSync, DataStore
  • Branch previews and atomic deploys
  • Lambda@Edge SSR support
  • $200 new-account credit (12 months)
– Cons
  • Pricing split across 4-5 metered axes
  • Bills easy to misforecast
  • Console UX is heavy and intimidating
  • Free Tier is now time-limited, not perpetual
Azure Static Web Apps4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • Free tier with 100GB bandwidth and custom domains
  • Standard is fixed $9/app/mo — no viral bill shock
  • Built-in Azure Functions integration
  • PR-staged preview environments
– Cons
  • DX trails Vercel/Netlify by a wide margin
  • Azure portal is overwhelming for solo devs
  • Free tier has no SLA
  • Function cold starts are slower than edge competitors