[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

AWS Amplify Hosting vs Firebase Hosting

AWS Amplify Hosting

7.0/ 10

Higher score

Firebase Hosting

8.0/ 10

Across 4 measured dimensions: AWS Amplify Hosting wins 0, Firebase Hosting wins 1 (3 tie / n/a)

[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions

Metric	AWS Amplify Hosting	Firebase Hosting
Score Winner: right	7.0	8.0
Δ 90 days	— flat	— flat
Parent & badge	Amazon.com, Inc.	Alphabet Inc.
Founded	2018	2011
Best for	Teams already deep in AWS who want Amplify to manage their static front-end	Sites already using Firebase Auth/Firestore that need matching hosting
Price per mo	Free/ mo	Free/ mo
Renewal multiplier	—	—
Tagline	AWS's Vercel competitor, billed the AWS way	Google's static + edge-rendered hosting, generous Spark tier

[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider

AWS Amplify Hosting4 pros · 4 cons

+ Pros

✓Tight integration with Cognito, AppSync, DataStore
✓Branch previews and atomic deploys
✓Lambda@Edge SSR support
✓$200 new-account credit (12 months)

– Cons

✗Pricing split across 4-5 metered axes
✗Bills easy to misforecast
✗Console UX is heavy and intimidating
✗Free Tier is now time-limited, not perpetual

Firebase Hosting4 pros · 4 cons

+ Pros

✓Spark free tier with global CDN
✓Atomic deploys and instant rollback
✓$300 new-user credit on Blaze
✓Tight integration with Cloud Functions / Run

– Cons

✗Spark daily bandwidth cap is tight (360MB/day)
✗Lock-in to Firebase Auth/Firestore
✗Google's product graveyard reputation
✗Blaze billing can spike without spending limits set

Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitAWS Amplify Hosting ↗Score 7.0 VisitFirebase Hosting ↗Score 8.0

← Read full AWS Amplify Hosting review·Read full Firebase Hosting review →

[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category

AWS Amplify Hosting vs Bunny.net

Firebase Hosting vs Bunny.net

AWS Amplify Hosting vs Render

Firebase Hosting vs Render

AWS Amplify Hosting vs GitHub Pages

Firebase Hosting vs GitHub Pages