[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Bunny.net vs Surge.sh

Higher score
Bunny.netIndie
8.7/ 10
Surge.shIndie
7.5/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Bunny.net wins 1, Surge.sh wins 1 (2 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricBunny.netSurge.sh
Score
Winner: left
8.77.5
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
IndependentIndie
IndependentIndie
Founded
20152014
Best for
High-traffic static sites that need real CDN economicsDevs who want `surge` in a terminal and zero dashboard fuss
Price per mo
Winner: right
$1.00/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
CDN-first static hosting, pennies per GBOne-command CLI static deploys, free for unlimited sites
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Bunny.net4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓$0.01/GB bandwidth, lowest credible CDN price
  • ✓Bunny Pages and Edge Scripting included
  • ✓Independent Slovenian ownership
  • ✓No request fees, $1/mo minimum
– Cons
  • ✗No free tier ($1/mo minimum)
  • ✗Dashboard rougher than Cloudflare
  • ✗Email-only support
  • ✗Smaller ecosystem and integrations
Surge.sh4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Free tier truly unlimited sites and custom domains
  • ✓`surge` CLI is the simplest deploy on Earth
  • ✓No build pipeline lock-in
  • ✓Independent, has survived since 2014
– Cons
  • ✗Pro at $30/mo is poor value vs Cloudflare Pages
  • ✗No Git integration or preview branches
  • ✗Dashboard / project management is minimal
  • ✗Slow feature development pace
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitBunny.net ↗Score 8.7VisitSurge.sh ↗Score 7.5
← Read full Bunny.net review·Read full Surge.sh review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Bunny.net vs Render
Compare
Surge.sh vs Render
Compare
Bunny.net vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Surge.sh vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Bunny.net vs Deno Deploy
Compare
Surge.sh vs Deno Deploy