[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Codeberg Pages vs GitHub Pages

Codeberg PagesIndie
7.6/ 10
Higher score
GitHub Pages
8.5/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Codeberg Pages wins 0, GitHub Pages wins 1 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricCodeberg PagesGitHub Pages
Score
Winner: right
7.68.5
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: left
IndependentIndie
Microsoft Corp.
Founded
20192008
Best for
FOSS fans who hate corporate vibesdevelopers looking for free static site hosting
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
FOSS Gitea-based hosting, community-fundedFree static hosting on the world's biggest code host
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Codeberg Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Fully FOSS stack, no corporate ties
  • ✓Free to use, no hidden costs
  • ✓Custom domains and SSL included
  • ✓Community-funded, feels genuine
– Cons
  • ✗Forgejo Actions still playing catch-up
  • ✗Smaller user base than big names
  • ✗No commercial SLA
  • ✗Relies on donations to keep going
GitHub Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Totally free for public repos
  • ✓Easy deploy with `git push`
  • ✓Supports custom domains with free HTTPS
  • ✓GitHub Actions for flex with static generators
– Cons
  • ✗No serverless or dynamic features
  • ✗Private repo Pages needs a paid plan
  • ✗Jekyll integration feels outdated
  • ✗Owned by Microsoft (if that bugs you)
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitCodeberg Pages ↗Score 7.6VisitGitHub Pages ↗Score 8.5
← Read full Codeberg Pages review·Read full GitHub Pages review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Render
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Render
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Firebase Hosting