[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Codeberg Pages vs GitHub Pages

Codeberg PagesIndie
7.6/ 10
Higher score
GitHub Pages
8.5/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Codeberg Pages wins 0, GitHub Pages wins 1 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricCodeberg PagesGitHub Pages
Score
Winner: right
7.68.5
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
Winner: left
IndependentIndie
Microsoft Corp.
Founded
20192008
Best for
FOSS projects who want a non-corporate alternative to GitHub PagesDevelopers hosting docs, portfolios, or project sites from a Git repo
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
FOSS Gitea-based hosting, community-fundedFree static hosting on the world's biggest code host
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Codeberg Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Truly FOSS stack, no corporate parent
  • ✓Free for public repos, fair-use bandwidth
  • ✓Custom domain + Let's Encrypt SSL
  • ✓Funded by community membership
– Cons
  • ✗Forgejo Actions ecosystem still maturing
  • ✗Smaller community than GitHub/GitLab
  • ✗No commercial SLA
  • ✗Donate to keep it sustainable
GitHub Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Free for public repos with usable soft limits
  • ✓Git push to deploy, no separate dashboard
  • ✓Custom domain and free HTTPS
  • ✓GitHub Actions unlocks any static generator
– Cons
  • ✗No serverless functions or dynamic routing
  • ✗Private repo Pages requires paid GitHub plan
  • ✗Default Jekyll pipeline is dated
  • ✗Microsoft-owned (matters if that matters to you)
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitCodeberg Pages ↗Score 7.6VisitGitHub Pages ↗Score 8.5
← Read full Codeberg Pages review·Read full GitHub Pages review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Render
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Render
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Deno Deploy
Compare
GitHub Pages vs Deno Deploy