[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Codeberg Pages vs Render

Codeberg PagesIndie
7.6/ 10
Higher score
RenderIndie
8.6/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Codeberg Pages wins 0, Render wins 1 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricCodeberg PagesRender
Score
Winner: right
7.68.6
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
IndependentIndie
IndependentIndie
Founded
20192019
Best for
FOSS fans who hate corporate vibesFolks tired of AWS headaches
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
FOSS Gitea-based hosting, community-fundedStatic sites free, paid backend without the AWS tax
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Codeberg Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Fully FOSS stack, no corporate ties
  • ✓Free to use, no hidden costs
  • ✓Custom domains and SSL included
  • ✓Community-funded, feels genuine
– Cons
  • ✗Forgejo Actions still playing catch-up
  • ✗Smaller user base than big names
  • ✗No commercial SLA
  • ✗Relies on donations to keep going
Render4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Truly free static hosting, no metered bandwidth
  • ✓Backend services with no AWS complexity
  • ✓Independent, no PE/big-cloud parent
  • ✓Unified billing across static/services/DB
– Cons
  • ✗Cold starts on free web services are slow
  • ✗Limited region selection (mostly US/EU)
  • ✗Postgres backup retention thin on lower tiers
  • ✗Status page sometimes lags real incidents
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitCodeberg Pages ↗Score 7.6VisitRender ↗Score 8.6
← Read full Codeberg Pages review·Read full Render review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
Render vs Bunny.net
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Render vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
Render vs Firebase Hosting