[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Bunny.net vs Codeberg Pages

Higher score
Bunny.netIndie
8.7/ 10
Codeberg PagesIndie
7.6/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Bunny.net wins 1, Codeberg Pages wins 1 (2 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricBunny.netCodeberg Pages
Score
Winner: left
8.77.6
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
IndependentIndie
IndependentIndie
Founded
20152019
Best for
Budget-minded static site ownersFOSS fans who hate corporate vibes
Price per mo
Winner: right
$1.00/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
CDN-first static hosting, pennies per GBFOSS Gitea-based hosting, community-funded
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Bunny.net4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓$0.01/GB bandwidth, super cheap
  • ✓Bunny Pages and Edge Scripting included
  • ✓Independent Slovenian ownership
  • ✓No request fees, $1/mo minimum
– Cons
  • ✗No free tier, $1/mo minimum
  • ✗Dashboard rougher than Cloudflare
  • ✗Email-only support
  • ✗Smaller ecosystem and integrations
Codeberg Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Fully FOSS stack, no corporate ties
  • ✓Free to use, no hidden costs
  • ✓Custom domains and SSL included
  • ✓Community-funded, feels genuine
– Cons
  • ✗Forgejo Actions still playing catch-up
  • ✗Smaller user base than big names
  • ✗No commercial SLA
  • ✗Relies on donations to keep going
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitBunny.net ↗Score 8.7VisitCodeberg Pages ↗Score 7.6
← Read full Bunny.net review·Read full Codeberg Pages review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Bunny.net vs Render
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Render
Compare
Bunny.net vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Bunny.net vs Firebase Hosting
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Firebase Hosting