[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Codeberg Pages vs Surge.sh

Higher score
Codeberg PagesIndie
7.6/ 10
Surge.shIndie
7.5/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Codeberg Pages wins 1, Surge.sh wins 0 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricCodeberg PagesSurge.sh
Score
Winner: left
7.67.5
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
IndependentIndie
IndependentIndie
Founded
20192014
Best for
FOSS projects who want a non-corporate alternative to GitHub PagesDevs who want `surge` in a terminal and zero dashboard fuss
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
FOSS Gitea-based hosting, community-fundedOne-command CLI static deploys, free for unlimited sites
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Codeberg Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Truly FOSS stack, no corporate parent
  • ✓Free for public repos, fair-use bandwidth
  • ✓Custom domain + Let's Encrypt SSL
  • ✓Funded by community membership
– Cons
  • ✗Forgejo Actions ecosystem still maturing
  • ✗Smaller community than GitHub/GitLab
  • ✗No commercial SLA
  • ✗Donate to keep it sustainable
Surge.sh4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Free tier truly unlimited sites and custom domains
  • ✓`surge` CLI is the simplest deploy on Earth
  • ✓No build pipeline lock-in
  • ✓Independent, has survived since 2014
– Cons
  • ✗Pro at $30/mo is poor value vs Cloudflare Pages
  • ✗No Git integration or preview branches
  • ✗Dashboard / project management is minimal
  • ✗Slow feature development pace
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitCodeberg Pages ↗Score 7.6VisitSurge.sh ↗Score 7.5
← Read full Codeberg Pages review·Read full Surge.sh review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
Surge.sh vs Bunny.net
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Render
Compare
Surge.sh vs Render
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Surge.sh vs GitHub Pages