[Compare · Static / JAMstack Hosting]

Codeberg Pages vs Surge.sh

Higher score
Codeberg PagesIndie
7.6/ 10
Surge.shIndie
7.5/ 10
Across 4 measured dimensions: Codeberg Pages wins 1, Surge.sh wins 0 (3 tie / n/a)
[01]

Side by side.

8 dimensions
MetricCodeberg PagesSurge.sh
Score
Winner: left
7.67.5
Δ 90 days
— flat— flat
Parent & badge
IndependentIndie
IndependentIndie
Founded
20192014
Best for
FOSS fans who hate corporate vibesDevs who love simple, no-frills hosting
Price per mo
Free/ moFree/ mo
Renewal multiplier
——
Tagline
FOSS Gitea-based hosting, community-fundedOne-command CLI static deploys, free for unlimited sites
[02]

What works, what doesn't.

Per provider
Codeberg Pages4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Fully FOSS stack, no corporate ties
  • ✓Free to use, no hidden costs
  • ✓Custom domains and SSL included
  • ✓Community-funded, feels genuine
– Cons
  • ✗Forgejo Actions still playing catch-up
  • ✗Smaller user base than big names
  • ✗No commercial SLA
  • ✗Relies on donations to keep going
Surge.sh4 pros · 4 cons
+ Pros
  • ✓Free tier unlimited sites
  • ✓Simple CLI deploy
  • ✓No pipeline lock-in
  • ✓Indie since 2014
– Cons
  • ✗$30/mo Pro poor value
  • ✗No Git integration
  • ✗Minimal dashboard
  • ✗Slow feature updates
Make the call

Pick one and go.

Both links are affiliate. Score doesn't move because of it.

VisitCodeberg Pages ↗Score 7.6VisitSurge.sh ↗Score 7.5
← Read full Codeberg Pages review·Read full Surge.sh review →
[03]

More jamstack matchups.

Same category
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Bunny.net
Compare
Surge.sh vs Bunny.net
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs Render
Compare
Surge.sh vs Render
Compare
Codeberg Pages vs GitHub Pages
Compare
Surge.sh vs GitHub Pages